Does Public Administration Know How to Evaluate Itself?

New research reveals: Public administration globally struggles to adapt to changing realities. While leading nations adopt innovative technologies for measuring effectiveness, many, including surprisingly agile tech hubs like Israel, lag in developing advanced tools for performance evaluation.

When a senior official in a government ministry is asked to explain how their organization’s success is measured, they hesitate. "We have metrics," they say, "but do they truly reflect our effectiveness? That’s a complex question." This question isn't unique to Israel. A comprehensive review of recent global studies points to a growing gap between the need to measure effectiveness in public administration and the practical ability to do so.

"The main problem is that reality changes faster than our ability to develop appropriate measurement tools," researchers explain. In an era of rapid technological changes and complex social challenges, the question of how to measure success in public administration becomes more intricate than ever.

The Data Revolution That Never Fully Arrived

While the private sector rapidly adopts advanced data analysis technologies, public administration progresses at a slower pace. Research published in 2024 indicates that only a minority of public organizations worldwide use advanced tools like Artificial Intelligence and big data analytics for performance measurement.

"It's not just a matter of technology," the research emphasizes. "It’s a matter of organizational culture." Countries like Estonia, Singapore, and Canada, which have successfully integrated advanced measurement systems, did so through a comprehensive transformation of organizational culture.

The Israeli Challenge

In Israel, the situation is even more complex. While the nation prides itself on being a "Startup Nation," its public administration struggles to adopt innovation in effectiveness measurement. Researchers point to three primary barriers: lack of suitable technological infrastructure, resistance to change among public administration employees, and difficulty in defining clear success metrics.

A study conducted at the University of Copenhagen and the University of Georgia sheds light on the challenge. The researchers surveyed hundreds of public administration studies and identified 72 different public values that influence the functioning of public organizations. The study's findings show that the challenge is not just in measurement, but in a deep understanding of the complex relationship among these various values.

Navigating the Labyrinth of Public Values: The "Public Value Nexus"

"Public values do not operate in a vacuum," explains Professor Todd S. Lægreid, a co-author of the research. "One value may reinforce or contradict another, and public organizations are required to navigate this labyrinth". The researchers identified three types of interrelationships between values: Proximity (values inherently related), Hierarchy (subordinate relationships between values), and Causality (values that influence each other).

A public value is a guiding principle reflecting the public interest and serving as a compass for public administration's conduct. In contrast, a public good/product is a service or resource the state provides to the general public, like security or infrastructure. The fundamental difference is that a public value guides behavior, while a public good is a tangible outcome.

The research revealed a complex relationship among public values. For example, transparency and secrecy are in constant tension – full transparency might harm security or privacy, while absolute secrecy harms public trust. Similarly, efficiency and democracy complement each other under certain conditions but conflict in others.

The researchers identified three key patterns:

• "Neighboring Values": Values inherently related to each other. For example, accountability and transparency support each other and reinforce one another.

• "Complementary Values": Values that work together to create higher value. For example, professionalism and fairness jointly create quality public service.

• "Competing Values": Values that sometimes clash with each other. For example, efficiency versus equity, or innovation versus stability.

  
  

"The findings indicate that effective public management requires a deep understanding of this value system," concludes Professor Barry Bozeman. "Success is measured by the ability to balance different values and adapt them to changing realities".

The Key to Success: Transparency and Engagement

"One of the most important lessons emerging from recent studies is that measuring effectiveness cannot be done in a vacuum," researchers explain. "It must include all stakeholders – from the ordinary citizen to senior management."

Countries that have succeeded in this area adopted an approach combining three components: full transparency of performance data, public participation in defining metrics, and the implementation of advanced technologies for data collection and analysis.

The Greek example is particularly interesting. Despite the ongoing economic crisis, Greece managed to implement an advanced performance measurement system in its public administration. The key to success was a combination of innovative technology with high involvement from employees and the public.

Future Challenges

The studies point to three major challenges facing the public sector in the coming years:

1. Coping with increasing complexity: How to measure success in a world where challenges become more complex?

2. Balancing privacy and transparency: How to collect and analyze data while maintaining the privacy of employees and citizens?

3. Implementing innovation: How to overcome resistance to change and implement new technologies?

   
   

Looking Ahead

"The key to success lies in flexibility," researchers conclude. "Public administration must develop the ability to adapt quickly to changing realities." This requires not only investment in technology but also a deep conceptual shift.

For Israel, the challenge is twofold: it must not only close the gap with leading nations but also develop a unique model suited to its specific characteristics. Studies show this is possible, but requires long-term commitment and collaboration among all stakeholders in the system.

"Ultimately," the research concludes, "the question is not whether to measure, but how to do so in a way that best serves the public interest." This challenge, more than any other, will shape the future of public administration in the coming years.

What does this practically mean for public service managers?

The studies offer several practical tools:

• Value Mapping: Managers should map the central values in their organization and identify their interrelationships.

• Conflict Management: Develop mechanisms for dealing with situations where values conflict, for example, between efficiency and quality.

• Measurement and Evaluation: Develop metrics that reflect the full range of values, not just quantitative performance.

• Organizational Communication: Reflect values to employees and stakeholders and embed them in the organizational culture.

• Decision-Making: Use the value map as a decision-support tool in complex situations.

We're here for you, and we couldn't be more excited about it!

In the unique complexities of public administration, truly evaluating oneself and translating that into public impact is paramount. PublicWise offers a strategic approach that bridges the paradox of measurement in the public sector – focusing not just on reports, but on creating genuine public value, building unwavering trust, and fostering efficient service delivery. Leveraging the principles of "Organizational Publicness," authentic dialogue, and proven methodologies, we help your organization redefine its success, gain clarity, and drive profound changes that strengthen citizen connections and ensure maximum public benefit.

Is Your Organization Truly Evaluating Itself?

• We struggle to clearly quantify and articulate true value
• Our evaluations don't effectively translate into change
• We face challenges in fostering strong trust
• There's an internal reluctance to embrace criticism

Don't face complexity alone. Did our survey help you clarify your main obstacle? In your personal, free, and no-obligation introductory meeting, you'll not only find your challenge deeply understood, but also gain a fresh perspective and the precise insight to start moving forward. Leave the meeting with clear direction and renewed motivation.

Discovery session

30

Book Now

References

1. Beck Jørgensen, T., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354-381.

2. Bryson, J., Crosby, B., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456.

3. David, G. (2024). Artificial intelligence: Opportunities and challenges for public administration. Canadian Public Administration, 67(3), 388-406.

4. George, B., Walker, R., & Monster, J. (2019). Does strategic planning improve organizational performance? A meta‐analysis. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 810-819.

5. Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A., & Tummers, L. (2016). Behavioral public administration: Combining insights from public administration and psychology. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 45-56.

6. Hartanto, D., Dalle, J., Akrim, A., & Anisah, H. (2021). Perceived effectiveness of e-governance as an underlying mechanism between good governance and public trust: A case of Indonesia. Digital Policy Regulation and Governance, 23(6), 598-616.

7. Kişi, N. (2024). Exploring employee engagement in the public sector: Antecedents, consequences and strategies. Public Administration Issues, 0(5), 111-129.

8. McGarvey, N. (2001). Accountability in public administration: A multi-perspective framework of analysis. Public Policy and Administration, 16(2), 17-29.

9. Mitsiou, D., & Zafiropoulos, K. (2024). Exploring the relationships between the enablers and results criteria of the EFQM model 2013 in the context of the Greek public administrative services. Administrative Sciences, 14(4), 79.

10. Moura, L., Lima, E., Deschamps, F., Aken, E., Costa, S., Treinta, F., & Cestari, J. (2019). Designing performance measurement systems in nonprofit and public administration organizations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(8), 1373-1410.

11. Popova, L., Seniv, B., Korol, V., Galushko, O., & Biriukov, I. (2023). The role of digital technologies in the public administration sphere. Cuestiones Políticas, 41(76), 207-221.

12. Temitope, T. (2023). Investigating innovative models of governance and collaboration for effective public administration in a multi-stakeholder landscape. International Journal Papier Public Review, 4(2), 18-28.

13. Viscusi, G., Spahiu, B., Maurino, A., & Batini, C. (2014). Compliance with open government data policies: An empirical assessment of Italian local public administrations. Information Polity, 19(3,4), 263-275.

14. Witesman, E. (2020). Public value governance: A framework. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 1-22). Springer.

Author Biography

Dr. Yinnon Dryzin-Amit is an expert in organizational and leadership development, driven by a profound passion for fostering thriving, resilient organizations and a deep sensitivity to human needs. He is renowned for translating cutting-edge behavioral science research into practical, strategic solutions across diverse sectors. As the founder of PublicWise, an innovative consultancy, he is dedicated to enhancing organizational performance and legitimacy through evidence-based frameworks, with a particular focus on the unique dynamics of "Organizational Publicness."

Previously, Dr. Dryzin-Amit served as Deputy Director General for Organizational Development in the Israeli Judiciary, where he spearheaded systemic change initiatives, cultivated organizational resilience, and designed strategic leadership development programs for judges and administrative staff. His extensive experience also includes significant contributions to the healthcare sector (Clalit Health Services) and defense establishment (IDF's Behavioral Sciences branch), where he consulted on organizational and management development, employee engagement, and process improvement. He currently shares his expertise as an Adjacent Lecturer at the University of Haifa, teaching in both the School of Public Administration & Policy and the Department of Sociology.

His research spans management, innovation, and the ecology of resilience in complex systems, reflecting his commitment to actionable insights. His publications include "Unveiling the Spirit of Publicness: Conceptualization and Validation of a Publicness Perceptions Scale" (Dryzin-Amit, Vashdi, & Vigoda-Gadot, 2024), "The Publicness Enigma: Can Perceived Publicness Predict Employees’ Formal and Prosocial Behavior Across Sectors?" (Dryzin-Amit, Vashdi, & Vigoda-Gadot, 2022), and "Beyond Individual Grit: A Multi-Level Framework for Systemic Judicial Resilience" (forthcoming, Dryzin-Amit, 2025).